The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Calcium supplementation for prevention of primary hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010037.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriela Cormick, Agustín Ciapponi, María Luisa Cafferata, María Sol Cormick, José M Belizán |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | 16% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Argentina | 2 | 11% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 26% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 196 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Researcher | 6 | 3% |
| Professor | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 130 | 66% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 138 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2024.
All research outputs
#661,067
of 26,558,327 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,112
of 13,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,094
of 535,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 535,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.