The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011862.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felix J Hüttner, Rosa Klotz, Alexis Ulrich, Markus W Büchler, Pascal Probst, Markus K Diener |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 29% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,923,579
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,955
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,389
of 531,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.