↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled steroids for acute asthma following emergency department discharge

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled steroids for acute asthma following emergency department discharge
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002316.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcia L Edmonds, Stephen J Milan, Barry E Brenner, Carlos A Camargo, Brian H Rowe

Abstract

Patients with acute asthma treated in the emergency department (ED) are frequently treated with inhaled beta(2)-agonists and systemic corticosteroids after discharge. The use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) following discharge may also be beneficial in improving patient outcomes after acute asthma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 202 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 15 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 72 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Psychology 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 79 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,577,420
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,116
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,013
of 286,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.