↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or motor neuron disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or motor neuron disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008554.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinghuan Fang, Muke Zhou, Mi Yang, Cairong Zhu, Li He

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 145 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 33 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,110,810
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,466
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,346
of 264,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.