The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Proton pump inhibitor treatment initiated prior to endoscopic diagnosis in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005415.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takeshi Kanno, Yuhong Yuan, Frances Tse, Colin W Howden, Paul Moayyedi, Grigorios I Leontiadis |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| Canada | 4 | 16% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 76% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 31% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 68 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,108,659
of 26,526,880 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,069
of 13,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,337
of 532,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,526,880 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.