| Title |
Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria in communities using insecticide-treated nets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012688.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph Pryce, Nancy Medley, Leslie Choi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 24% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 79% |
| Scientists | 6 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 180 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 75 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 80 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,233,617
of 24,744,050 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,684
of 12,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,623
of 510,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,744,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.