↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000028.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivian Welch, Omar Dewidar, Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu, Salman Abdisalam, Abdulah Al Ameer, Victoria I Barbeau, Kevin Brand, Kisanet Kebedom, Maria Benkhalti, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Mohamad Tarek Madani, Alba M Antequera Martín, Christine M Mathew, Jessie McGowan, William McLeod, Hanbyoul Agatha Park, Jennifer Petkovic, Alison Riddle, Peter Tugwell, Mark Petticrew, Jessica Trawin, George A Wells

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 9 11%
Unspecified 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Psychology 9 11%
Unspecified 8 10%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 21 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,077,500
of 21,355,489 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,541
of 12,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,526
of 384,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,355,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.