↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001970.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren Young, Sam J Oddie, William McGuire

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Unspecified 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 35%
Unspecified 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,006,534
of 22,413,408 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,276
of 12,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,540
of 429,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,413,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.