| Title |
Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes for neonates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013736.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vedanta Dariya, Luca Moresco, Matteo Bruschettini, Luc P Brion |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Sweden | 3 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Design | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 44 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,221,666
of 24,486,486 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,683
of 12,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,698
of 510,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,486,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.