The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interleukin‐1 blocking agents for treating COVID‐19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015308 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mauricia Davidson, Sonia Menon, Anna Chaimani, Theodoros Evrenoglou, Lina Ghosn, Carolina Graña, Nicholas Henschke, Elise Cogo, Gemma Villanueva, Gabriel Ferrand, Carolina Riveros, Hillary Bonnet, Philipp Kapp, Conor Moran, Declan Devane, Joerg J Meerpohl, Gabriel Rada, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Giacomo Grasselli, David Tovey, Philippe Ravaud, Isabelle Boutron |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 8% |
| South Africa | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 38 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 67% |
| Scientists | 10 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 61 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 69 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#800,637
of 26,173,059 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,420
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,745
of 531,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,173,059 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.