↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cephalomedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Cephalomedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in older adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000093.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon R Lewis, Richard Macey, James R Gill, Martyn J Parker, Xavier L Griffin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Other 11 10%
Student > Master 11 10%
Researcher 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 48 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Unspecified 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 54 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,615,249
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,395
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,822
of 522,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.