↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Radiotherapy and chemoradiation after surgery for early cervical cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
Radiotherapy and chemoradiation after surgery for early cervical cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007583.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Rogers, Shing Shun N Siu, David Luesley, Andrew Bryant, Heather O Dickinson

Abstract

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review first published in Issue 4, 2009. There is an ongoing debate about the indications for, and value of, adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy after radical surgery in women with early cervical cancer. Certain combinations of pathological risk factors are thought to represent sufficient risk for recurrence, that they justify the use of postoperative pelvic radiotherapy, though this has never been shown to improve overall survival, and use of more than one type of treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) increases the risks of side effects and complications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 213 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 16%
Student > Master 27 13%
Researcher 17 8%
Other 15 7%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 67 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 68 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,618,152
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,031
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,789
of 176,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.