Report for: Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia

Title	Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia
Published in	Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI	10.1002/14651858.cd005135.pub3
Pubmed ID	23440799
Authors	Alex J Shortt, Bruce DS Allan, Jennifer R Evans
Abstract	Myopia (also known as short-sightedness or near-sightedness) is an ocular condition in which the refractive power of the eye is greater than is required, resulting in light from distant objects being focused in front of the retina instead of directly on it. The two most commonly used surgical techniques to permanently correct myopia are photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United Kingdom	1	25%
Unknown	3	75%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	4	100%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United States	2	<1%
United Kingdom	1	<1%
Israel	1	<1%
Egypt	1	<1%
Unknown	196	98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	31	15%
Student > Bachelor	30	15%
Researcher	27	13%
Student > Doctoral Student	20	10%
Student > Ph. D. Student	15	7%
Other	35	17%
Unknown	43	21%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	86	43%
Nursing and Health Professions	17	8%
Psychology	8	4%
Social Sciences	5	2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science	4	2%
Other	25	12%
Unknown	56	28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.

All research outputs

#1,017,418

of 23,377,816 outputs

Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#2,251

of 12,648 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#9,455

of 285,604 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#26

of 174 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 23,377,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 12,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context