| Title |
Laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005135.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex J Shortt, Bruce DS Allan, Jennifer R Evans |
| Abstract |
Myopia (also known as short-sightedness or near-sightedness) is an ocular condition in which the refractive power of the eye is greater than is required, resulting in light from distant objects being focused in front of the retina instead of directly on it. The two most commonly used surgical techniques to permanently correct myopia are photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 226 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 64 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 79 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,184,224
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,473
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,183
of 291,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.