↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Collaboration between local health and local government agencies for health improvement

Overview of attention for article published in this source, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Collaboration between local health and local government agencies for health improvement
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007825.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayes, Sara L, Mann, Mala K, Morgan, Fiona M, Kitcher, Hilary, Kelly, Mark J, Weightman, Alison L

Abstract

In many countries, national, regional and local inter- and intra-agency collaborations have been introduced in order to improve health outcomes. Evidence is needed on the effectiveness of locally-developed partnerships which target changes in individual health outcomes and behaviours.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 100 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 29%
Student > Master 16 15%
Other 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Psychology 17 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Decision Sciences 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 16 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,107,936
of 14,432,587 outputs
Outputs from this source
#4,802
of 10,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,428
of 243,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#248
of 482 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,432,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 482 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.