↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Low‐carbohydrate versus balanced‐carbohydrate diets for reducing weight and cardiovascular risk

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
44 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
407 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
12 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
Title
Low‐carbohydrate versus balanced‐carbohydrate diets for reducing weight and cardiovascular risk
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013334.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celeste E Naude, Amanda Brand, Anel Schoonees, Kim A Nguyen, Marty Chaplin, Jimmy Volmink

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 407 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 276 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Master 21 8%
Other 13 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 3%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 154 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Sports and Recreations 6 2%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 160 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 630. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#36,277
of 25,958,626 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 13,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,355
of 527,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,958,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.