↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Community pharmacy personnel interventions for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Community pharmacy personnel interventions for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003698.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hazel K Sinclair, Christine M Bond, Lindsay F Stead

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 29 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 7 5%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,444,571
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,964
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,696
of 147,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.