Intramuscular versus intravenous anti‐D for preventing Rhesus alloimmunization during pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter: 1 X user
wikipedia: 1 Wikipedia page

f1000: 1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation: 15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 121 Mendeley

Summary X Wikipedia Research highlights Dimensions citations

So far, Dimensions has found 15 publications that cite this research output.

15

The most recent citing publications are shown below. View all 15 publications that cite this research output on Dimensions.

Does high body mass index (>25 kg/m2) or weight (>80 kg) reduce the effectiveness of anti‐D prophylaxis in Rh(D)‐negative pregnant women? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Article in Vox Sanguinis (June 2024)

Internationale richtlijnen voor het gebruik van Rhesus D immunoglobuline: een vergelijkend onderzoek en de plaats van foetale Rhesus D genotypering

Article in Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (April 2023)

Impact of Immunization Prophylaxis on the Course of Pregnancy in Rh-Negative Women

Article in Ukraïnsʹkij žurnal medicini bìologìï ta sportu (July 2022)