↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011347.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vijay Tailor, Siobhan Ludden, Manuela Bossi, Catey Bunce, John A Greenwood, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Master 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 6 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Psychology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,614,468
of 21,322,016 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,745
of 12,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,582
of 385,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,322,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.