| Title |
Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011347.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vijay Tailor, Siobhan Ludden, Manuela Bossi, Catey Bunce, John A Greenwood, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 42% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 60 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,983,895
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,265
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,120
of 520,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.