↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin C for preventing and treating the common cold

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 12,110)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
385 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1120 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Vitamin C for preventing and treating the common cold
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000980.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harri Hemilä, Elizabeth Chalker

Abstract

Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) for preventing and treating the common cold has been a subject of controversy for 70 years.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,308 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Peru 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 1102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 227 20%
Student > Master 146 13%
Researcher 115 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 7%
Other 70 6%
Other 215 19%
Unknown 273 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 305 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 115 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 89 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 70 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 59 5%
Other 179 16%
Unknown 303 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3362. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,395
of 21,770,930 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 12,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3
of 282,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,770,930 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.