The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013404.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharon R Lewis, Richard Macey, Jamie Stokes, Jonathan A Cook, William Gp Eardley, Xavier L Griffin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 29% |
| Scientists | 7 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 43 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,497,206
of 26,266,075 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,015
of 13,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,819
of 548,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,266,075 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 548,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.