↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
309 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
328 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
914 Mendeley
Title
Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007950.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luz Maria De-Regil, Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas, Ana C Fernández-Gaxiola, Pura Rayco-Solon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 309 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 914 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 909 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 156 17%
Student > Bachelor 137 15%
Researcher 95 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 8%
Other 45 5%
Other 166 18%
Unknown 243 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 279 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 146 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 4%
Social Sciences 28 3%
Other 108 12%
Unknown 279 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 274. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#109,386
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#195
of 12,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,831
of 390,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.