↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
293 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
388 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1043 Mendeley
Title
Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007950.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luz Maria De‐Regil, Juan Pablo Peña‐Rosas, Ana C Fernández‐Gaxiola, Pura Rayco‐Solon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 293 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,043 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 1038 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 166 16%
Student > Bachelor 148 14%
Researcher 98 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 7%
Other 50 5%
Other 162 16%
Unknown 343 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 293 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 159 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 3%
Social Sciences 30 3%
Other 102 10%
Unknown 384 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 288. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#123,422
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#224
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,826
of 397,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.