The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007950.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luz Maria De‐Regil, Juan Pablo Peña‐Rosas, Ana C Fernández‐Gaxiola, Pura Rayco‐Solon |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 19 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 91 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 121 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 10% |
| Scientists | 12 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1099 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 170 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 153 | 14% |
| Researcher | 98 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 7% |
| Other | 52 | 5% |
| Other | 180 | 16% |
| Unknown | 374 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 302 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 163 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 3% |
| Other | 117 | 11% |
| Unknown | 415 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#205,717
of 26,362,953 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#337
of 13,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,081
of 399,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,362,953 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.