↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
303 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
348 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
965 Mendeley
Title
Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007950.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luz Maria De-Regil, Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas, Ana C Fernández-Gaxiola, Pura Rayco-Solon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 303 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 965 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 960 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 163 17%
Student > Bachelor 143 15%
Researcher 95 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 7%
Other 46 5%
Other 187 19%
Unknown 260 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 284 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 153 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 4%
Unspecified 32 3%
Other 123 13%
Unknown 298 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 276. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#116,963
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#215
of 12,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,871
of 395,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.