↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
149 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
395 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1082 Mendeley
Title
Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007950.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luz Maria De‐Regil, Juan Pablo Peña‐Rosas, Ana C Fernández‐Gaxiola, Pura Rayco‐Solon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,082 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 1077 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 166 15%
Student > Bachelor 150 14%
Researcher 98 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 7%
Other 51 5%
Other 185 17%
Unknown 355 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 295 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 163 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 3%
Social Sciences 31 3%
Other 122 11%
Unknown 396 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#200,496
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#330
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,053
of 398,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.