↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
520 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
490 Mendeley
Title
Vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000422.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Moberley, John Holden, David Paul Tatham, Ross M Andrews

Abstract

Diseases caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) continue to cause substantial morbidity and mortality globally. Whilst pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines (PPVs) have the potential to prevent disease and death, the degree of protection afforded against various clinical endpoints and within different populations is uncertain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 490 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 473 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 15%
Student > Master 58 12%
Student > Bachelor 57 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 8%
Other 37 8%
Other 105 21%
Unknown 120 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 193 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 3%
Other 79 16%
Unknown 128 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2024.
All research outputs
#813,022
of 26,549,961 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,424
of 13,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,149
of 296,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,549,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.