↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Angioplasty versus stenting for subclavian artery stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Angioplasty versus stenting for subclavian artery stenosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008461.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wagner Iared, José Eduardo Mourão, Andrea Puchnick, Fernando Soma, David Carlos Shigueoka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 5 8%
Researcher 4 7%
Librarian 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 25 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 37%
Unspecified 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 33 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,629,651
of 25,010,497 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,086
of 13,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,987
of 437,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,010,497 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.