↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Angioplasty versus stenting for subclavian artery stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Angioplasty versus stenting for subclavian artery stenosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008461.pub4
Authors

Wagner Iared, José Eduardo Mourão, Andrea Puchnick, Fernando Soma, David Carlos Shigueoka

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 32%
Librarian 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Unspecified 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 55%
Unspecified 3 14%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 5 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,400,008
of 21,355,489 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,262
of 12,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,370
of 335,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,355,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.