↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
Title
Custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006801.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Hawke, Joshua Burns, Joel A Radford, Verona du Toit

Abstract

Custom foot orthoses are commonly recommended for the treatment of foot pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 293 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 23%
Student > Bachelor 49 16%
Student > Postgraduate 26 9%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Other 57 19%
Unknown 51 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Psychology 13 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 69 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2021.
All research outputs
#465,510
of 18,244,737 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,023
of 11,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,034
of 259,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 479 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,244,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 479 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.