↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Custom‐made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
403 Mendeley
Title
Custom‐made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006801.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Hawke, Joshua Burns, Joel A Radford, Verona du Toit

Abstract

Custom foot orthoses are commonly recommended for the treatment of foot pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 393 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 84 21%
Student > Bachelor 58 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 8%
Researcher 30 7%
Student > Postgraduate 26 6%
Other 66 16%
Unknown 107 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 136 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Psychology 14 3%
Sports and Recreations 11 3%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 130 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2022.
All research outputs
#754,937
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,406
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,487
of 96,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.