↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Diagnostic test accuracy and cost‐effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost‐effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013387.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra McAleenan, Hayley E Jones, Ashleigh Kernohan, Tomos Robinson, Lena Schmidt, Sarah Dawson, Claire Kelly, Emmelyn Spencer Leal, Claire L Faulkner, Abigail Palmer, Christopher Wragg, Sarah Jefferies, Sebastian Brandner, Luke Vale, Julian Pt Higgins, Kathreena M Kurian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 21 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 22 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,619,300
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,220
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,177
of 450,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.