Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee disease (osteoarthritis including degenerative meniscal tears)
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
Denise O'Connor, Renea V Johnston, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Rudolf W Poolman, Sheila Cyril, Per O Vandvik, Rachelle Buchbinder
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 208 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||169||81%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||13||6%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||<1%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||14||15%|
|Student > Master||8||9%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||4||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||23||25%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||9||10%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||4||4%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||1||1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,526,614 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 433,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,526,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.