↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013520.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Su-Hsun Liu, Barbara S Hawkins, Sueko M Ng, Mark Ren, Louis Leslie, Genie Han, Irene C Kuo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Other 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 42 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 48 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,093,166
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,846
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,105
of 449,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.