↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Systemic interventions for treatment of Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and SJS/TEN overlap syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Systemic interventions for treatment of Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and SJS/TEN overlap syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013130.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Audrey Jacobsen, Bayanne Olabi, Annie Langley, Jennifer Beecker, Eric Mutter, Amanda Shelley, Brandon Worley, Timothy Ramsay, Arturo Saavedra, Roses Parker, Fiona Stewart, Jordi Pardo Pardo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 126 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 10 8%
Student > Master 9 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 61 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Psychology 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 67 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,415,847
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,890
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,932
of 448,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.