| Title |
Duct‐to‐mucosa versus other types of pancreaticojejunostomy for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013462.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hua Hai, Zhuyin Li, Ziwei Zhang, Yao Cheng, Zuojin Liu, Jianping Gong, Yilei Deng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,741,961
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,139
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,017
of 450,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.