| Title |
Pressure-relieving interventions for treating diabetic foot ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002302.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jane Lewis, Allyson Lipp |
| Abstract |
Diabetes-related foot ulceration is a major contributor to morbidity in diabetes. Diabetic foot ulcers are partly a consequence of abnormal foot pressures and pressure relief is a widely used treatment for healing diabetes-related plantar foot ulcers, but the most effective method for healing is unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 415 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 80 | 19% |
| Researcher | 48 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 10% |
| Other | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 86 | 20% |
| Unknown | 101 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 167 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 9% |
| Unknown | 123 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,933,681
of 23,664,476 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,293
of 12,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,856
of 286,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,664,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.