↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1064 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
848 Mendeley
Title
Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003311.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan E Jacobs, Marie Berg, Rod Hunt, William O Tarnow-Mordi, Terrie E Inder, Peter G Davis

Abstract

Newborn animal studies and pilot studies in humans suggest that mild hypothermia following peripartum hypoxia-ischaemia in newborn infants may reduce neurological sequelae without adverse effects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 848 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 820 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 126 15%
Student > Bachelor 108 13%
Researcher 101 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 99 12%
Other 81 10%
Other 197 23%
Unknown 136 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 432 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 7%
Neuroscience 47 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 2%
Other 90 11%
Unknown 173 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#779,400
of 18,890,258 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,890
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,171
of 163,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,890,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.