↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1593 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1043 Mendeley
Title
Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003311.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan E Jacobs, Marie Berg, Rod Hunt, William O Tarnow‐Mordi, Terrie E Inder, Peter G Davis

Abstract

Newborn animal studies and pilot studies in humans suggest that mild hypothermia following peripartum hypoxia-ischaemia in newborn infants may reduce neurological sequelae without adverse effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,043 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 1027 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 133 13%
Student > Bachelor 133 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 108 10%
Researcher 99 9%
Other 77 7%
Other 189 18%
Unknown 304 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 426 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 7%
Neuroscience 52 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 3%
Other 96 9%
Unknown 343 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#969,517
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,886
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,902
of 293,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.