↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
261 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
Title
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011135.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Pega, Roman Pabayo, Claire Benny, Eun-Young Lee, Stefan K Lhachimi, Sze Yan Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 261 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 272 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 10%
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Other 14 5%
Student > Bachelor 13 5%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 135 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Social Sciences 21 8%
Psychology 11 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 150 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 413. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#71,714
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,320
of 447,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.