| Title |
Probiotics for treatment of chronic constipation in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014257.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chris Wallace, Vassiliki Sinopoulou, Morris Gordon, Anthony K Akobeng, Alejandro Llanos-Chea, Gregory Hungria, Liz Febo-Rodriguez, Amanda Fifi, Lilibet Fernandez Valdes, Amber Langshaw, Miguel Saps |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Japan | 3 | 12% |
| South Africa | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Fiji | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 52 | 40% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 44 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 50 | 39% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 48 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,122,541
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,280
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,180
of 448,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.