The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Prophylactic cyclo‐oxygenase inhibitor drugs for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants: a network meta‐analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013846.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Souvik Mitra, Courtney E Gardner, Abigale MacLellan, Tim Disher, Danielle M Styranko, Marsha Campbell-Yeo, Stefan Kuhle, Bradley C Johnston, Jon Dorling |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
United States | 2 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Peru | 1 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 30 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 67% |
Scientists | 8 | 19% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
Unspecified | 9 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
Other | 23 | 17% |
Unknown | 64 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
Chemical Engineering | 5 | 4% |
Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Unknown | 69 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,315,120
of 26,626,316 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,558
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,893
of 456,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,626,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.