↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for meralgia paraesthetica

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
21 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for meralgia paraesthetica
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004159.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nofal Khalil, Alessia Nicotra, Wojtek Rakowicz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Other 10 8%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 37 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 40 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,566,695
of 26,310,456 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,165
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,777
of 291,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,310,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.