| Title |
Treatment for meralgia paraesthetica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004159.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nofal Khalil, Alessia Nicotra, Wojtek Rakowicz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 14% |
| Turkey | 2 | 10% |
| Russia | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Algeria | 1 | 5% |
| Egypt | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,488,983
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,159
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,230
of 288,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.