↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Time‐limited home‐care reablement services for maintaining and improving the functional independence of older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
409 Mendeley
Title
Time‐limited home‐care reablement services for maintaining and improving the functional independence of older adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010825.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andy Cochrane, Mairead Furlong, Sinead McGilloway, David W Molloy, Michael Stevenson, Michael Donnelly

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 409 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 408 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 9%
Student > Bachelor 36 9%
Researcher 34 8%
Student > Postgraduate 23 6%
Other 75 18%
Unknown 151 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 75 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 15%
Social Sciences 27 7%
Psychology 24 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 1%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 173 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,749,649
of 26,038,372 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,335
of 13,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,291
of 328,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#140
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,038,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.