↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Guidewire-assisted cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Guidewire-assisted cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009662.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances Tse, Jasmine Liu, Yuhong Yuan, Paul Moayyedi, Grigorios I Leontiadis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 25%
Unspecified 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 58%
Unspecified 2 17%
Design 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,970,730
of 21,235,767 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,677
of 12,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,859
of 323,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,235,767 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.