| Title |
Diagnostic test accuracy of remote, multidomain cognitive assessment (telephone and video call) for dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013724.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucy C Beishon, Emma Elliott, Tuuli M Hietamies, Riona Mc Ardle, Aoife O'Mahony, Amy R Elliott, Terry J Quinn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 20% |
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| Argentina | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 75% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 36 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 29% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 39 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#971,711
of 24,176,243 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,041
of 12,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,994
of 432,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,176,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.