Title |
Narrow band imaging versus white light cystoscopy alone for transurethral resection of non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014887.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lillian Y Lai, Sean M Tafuri, Emily C Ginier, Lindsey A Herrel, Philipp Dahm, Philipp Maisch, Giulia Ippolito Lane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 27 | 63% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 31 | 72% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 318. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#108,638
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#205
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,481
of 450,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.