↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
Title
Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004323.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jørn Pachler, Peer Wille-Jørgensen

Abstract

For almost one hundred years abdominoperineal excision has been the standard treatment of choice for rectal cancer. With advances in the techniques for rectal resection and anastomosis, anterior resection with preservation of the sphincter function has become the preferred treatment for rectal cancers, except for those cancers very close to the anal sphincter. The main reason for this has been the conviction that the quality of life for patients with a colostomy after abdominoperineal excision was poorer than for patients undergoing an operation with a sphincter-preserving technique. However, patients having sphincter-preserving operations may experience symptoms affecting their quality of life that are different from stoma-patients.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 206 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 14%
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 10%
Other 50 24%
Unknown 32 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 16%
Psychology 12 6%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 45 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,860,074
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,794
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,609
of 141,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.