↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chest physiotherapy for pneumonia in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
375 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Chest physiotherapy for pneumonia in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006338.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming Yang, Yuping Yan, Xiangli Yin, Bin Y Wang, Taixiang Wu, Guan J Liu, Bi Rong Dong

Abstract

Despite conflicting evidence, chest physiotherapy has been widely used as an adjunctive treatment for adults with pneumonia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 368 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 93 25%
Student > Master 52 14%
Student > Postgraduate 27 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 7%
Researcher 24 6%
Other 70 19%
Unknown 84 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 5%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Sports and Recreations 8 2%
Other 35 9%
Unknown 95 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#698,580
of 17,366,233 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,772
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,904
of 157,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,366,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.