↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dental extractions prior to radiotherapy to the jaws for reducing post‐radiotherapy dental complications

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Dental extractions prior to radiotherapy to the jaws for reducing post‐radiotherapy dental complications
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008857.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shiyana Eliyas, Ahmed Al‐Khayatt, Richard WJ Porter, Peter Briggs

Abstract

Radiotherapy as part of head and neck cancer treatment leaves patients requiring much dental rehabilitation in a compromised environment that is difficult for the patient and the dental team to manage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 16%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Researcher 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 57 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 65 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,785,316
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,869
of 12,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,609
of 201,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.