↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
24 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
504 Mendeley
Title
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001865.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian GK Edwards, Gurudutt Naik, Harry Ahmed, Glyn J Elwyn, Timothy Pickles, Kerry Hood, Rebecca Playle

Abstract

There is a trend towards greater patient involvement in healthcare decisions. Although screening is usually perceived as good for the health of the population, there are risks associated with the tests involved. Achieving both adequate involvement of consumers and informed decision making are now seen as important goals for screening programmes. Personalised risk estimates have been shown to be effective methods of risk communication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 504 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 491 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 15%
Researcher 60 12%
Student > Bachelor 54 11%
Other 31 6%
Other 84 17%
Unknown 120 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 156 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 12%
Psychology 42 8%
Social Sciences 33 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Other 62 12%
Unknown 139 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,027,497
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,042
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,092
of 206,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.