The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Housing improvements for health and associated socio‐economic outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008657.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hilary Thomson, Sian Thomas, Eva Sellstrom, Mark Petticrew |
| Abstract |
The well established links between poor housing and poor health indicate that housing improvement may be an important mechanism through which public investment can lead to health improvement. Intervention studies which have assessed the health impacts of housing improvements are an important data resource to test assumptions about the potential for health improvement. Evaluations may not detect long term health impacts due to limited follow-up periods. Impacts on socio-economic determinants of health may be a valuable proxy indication of the potential for longer term health impacts. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| Canada | 4 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 47 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 23% |
| Scientists | 9 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 932 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Peru | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 905 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 169 | 18% |
| Researcher | 157 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 122 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 83 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 50 | 5% |
| Other | 148 | 16% |
| Unknown | 203 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 225 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 121 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 98 | 11% |
| Psychology | 49 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 3% |
| Other | 159 | 17% |
| Unknown | 250 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 144. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2021.
All research outputs
#303,252
of 26,315,660 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#492
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,857
of 207,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,315,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.