↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical rehabilitation for older people in long‐term care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
919 Mendeley
Title
Physical rehabilitation for older people in long‐term care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004294.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Crocker, Anne Forster, John Young, Lesley Brown, Seline Ozer, Jane Smith, John Green, Jo Hardy, Eileen Burns, Elizabeth Glidewell, Darren C Greenwood

Abstract

The worldwide population is progressively ageing, with an expected increase in morbidity and demand for long-term care. Physical rehabilitation is beneficial in older people, but relatively little is known about effects on long-term care residents. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 919 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 898 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 150 16%
Student > Bachelor 116 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 12%
Researcher 73 8%
Student > Postgraduate 54 6%
Other 170 18%
Unknown 250 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 262 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 144 16%
Psychology 48 5%
Sports and Recreations 34 4%
Social Sciences 27 3%
Other 116 13%
Unknown 288 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,631,225
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,320
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,001
of 207,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.