The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Physical rehabilitation for older people in long‐term care
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004294.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tom Crocker, Anne Forster, John Young, Lesley Brown, Seline Ozer, Jane Smith, John Green, Jo Hardy, Eileen Burns, Elizabeth Glidewell, Darren C Greenwood |
Abstract |
The worldwide population is progressively ageing, with an expected increase in morbidity and demand for long-term care. Physical rehabilitation is beneficial in older people, but relatively little is known about effects on long-term care residents. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 919 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Papua New Guinea | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | <1% |
Unknown | 898 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 150 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 116 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 106 | 12% |
Researcher | 73 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 54 | 6% |
Other | 170 | 18% |
Unknown | 250 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 262 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 144 | 16% |
Psychology | 48 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 34 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 27 | 3% |
Other | 116 | 13% |
Unknown | 288 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,631,225
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,320
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,001
of 207,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.