↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
840 Mendeley
Title
Physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004294.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Crocker, Anne Forster, John Young, Lesley Brown, Seline Ozer, Jane Smith, John Green, Jo Hardy, Eileen Burns, Elizabeth Glidewell, Darren C Greenwood

Abstract

The worldwide population is progressively ageing, with an expected increase in morbidity and demand for long-term care. Physical rehabilitation is beneficial in older people, but relatively little is known about effects on long-term care residents. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 840 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 819 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 143 17%
Student > Bachelor 113 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 12%
Researcher 70 8%
Student > Postgraduate 54 6%
Other 178 21%
Unknown 180 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 249 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 137 16%
Psychology 46 5%
Sports and Recreations 34 4%
Social Sciences 27 3%
Other 130 15%
Unknown 217 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,422,549
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,269
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,670
of 193,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.