↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
41 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
Title
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009612.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Deckx, An IM De Sutter, Linda Guo, Nabiel A Mir, Mieke L van Driel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 343 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 54 16%
Student > Master 51 15%
Other 28 8%
Researcher 22 6%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 61 18%
Unknown 109 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 5%
Psychology 15 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 123 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#271,899
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#451
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,234
of 323,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.