↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009261.pub7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gill Norman, Chunhu Shi, En Lin Goh, Elizabeth MA Murphy, Adam Reid, Laura Chiverton, Monica Stankiewicz, Jo C Dumville

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,008,395
of 21,440,657 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,342
of 12,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,694
of 334,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,440,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.