↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus conservative interventions for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Surgical versus conservative interventions for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008628.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Bruce, Alasdair Sutherland

Abstract

Fractures of the calcaneus (heel bone) comprise up to 2% of all fractures. These fractures are mostly caused by a fall from a height, and are common in younger adults. Treatment can be surgical or non-surgical; however, there is clinical uncertainty over optimal management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 262 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 17%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Other 22 8%
Other 55 21%
Unknown 59 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Psychology 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 74 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,226,341
of 22,641,687 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,752
of 12,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,094
of 282,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,641,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.