The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Partial liquid ventilation for the prevention of mortality and morbidity in paediatric acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003845.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alka Kaushal, Conor G McDonnell, Mark William Davies |
| Abstract |
Acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome are syndromes of severe respiratory failure. Children with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome have high mortality and the survivors have significant morbidity. Partial liquid ventilation is proposed as a less injurious form of respiratory support for these children. Uncontrolled studies in adults have shown improvements in gas exchange and lung compliance with partial liquid ventilation. A single uncontrolled study in six children with acute respiratory syndrome showed some improvement in gas exchange during three hours of partial liquid ventilation. This review was originally published in 2004, updated in 2009 and again in 2012. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 217 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 15% |
| Researcher | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 18% |
| Unknown | 73 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 14% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 86 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,334,729
of 26,563,746 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,937
of 13,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,676
of 207,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.