Title |
Workplace interventions to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection outside of healthcare settings
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015112.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ana Beatriz Pizarro, Emma Persad, Solange Durao, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Jean S Engela-Volker, Damien McElvenny, Sarah Rhodes, Katie Stocking, Tony Fletcher, Craig Martin, Kukuh Noertjojo, Olivia Sampson, Jos H Verbeek, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Matteo Bruschettini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 165 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 15 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 5% |
Spain | 6 | 4% |
Sweden | 3 | 2% |
South Africa | 3 | 2% |
Finland | 2 | 1% |
Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Unknown | 114 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 142 | 86% |
Scientists | 16 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
Unspecified | 15 | 11% |
Researcher | 14 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 14% |
Unknown | 61 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 20% |
Unspecified | 16 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
Psychology | 5 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 11% |
Unknown | 68 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 162. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#243,735
of 24,876,519 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#406
of 12,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,913
of 434,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,876,519 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.